My understanding of the Lord's supper growing up was that it was a time to examine myself; it was a time for introspecting. When we would observe the Lord's supper, the lights were dimmed, and soft music was played to make the mood somber and glum. We were then told to bow our heads and examine our recent track record. We were then to confess our sins to God so we could be forgiven, cleansed, and qualify to partake of communion. I'm unsure how far back I was supposed to examine my performance record. I am guessing that I only needed to examine myself as far back as the last communion when I had also been forgiven, cleansed, and qualified at that time (tongue in cheek). Where did we come up with the idea that the Lord's supper is supposed to be focused on me and not the Lord? Is the Lord a double talker, are we forgiven and cleansed of all our sins but at the Lord's supper, we need to be cleansed of more sins? How does this make any sense? 1 Corinthians 11:28 Everyone ought to examine themselves before they eat of the bread and drink from the cup. This is the supportive verse that is usually read during a clergy-led communion. It seems to make sense. Hmmm, I guess the bible does tell me to examine myself. But wait, what if we read more of Paul's letter and don't skip around the Bible using single verses as proof text for our church traditions? Instead of reading the letter written by Paul, let us briefly take a look at a more extensive section of the letter so that we can see some of the contexts as Paul corrects an abuse of the Lord's supper among these believers in Corinth. Here is an excerpt from Corinthians 11 in the following instructions, I cannot praise you. For it sounds as if more harm than good is done when you meet together. First, I hear that there are divisions among you when you meet as a church, and to some extent, I believe it. But, of course, there must be divisions among you so that you who have God’s approval will be recognized! When you meet together, you are not really interested in the Lord’s Supper. For some of you hurry to eat your own meal without sharing with others. As a result, some go hungry while others get drunk. What? Don’t you have your own homes for eating and drinking? Or do you really want to disgrace God’s church and shame the poor? What am I supposed to say? Do you want me to praise you? Well, I certainly will not praise you for this! For I pass on to you what I received from the Lord himself. On the night when he was betrayed, the Lord Jesus took some bread and gave thanks to God for it. Then he broke it in pieces and said, “This is my body, which is given for you. Do this in remembrance of me.” In the same way, he took the cup of wine after supper, saying, “This cup is the new covenant between God and his people—an agreement confirmed with my blood. Do this in remembrance of me as often as you drink it.” For every time you eat this bread and drink this cup, you are announcing the Lord’s death until he comes again. So anyone who eats this bread or drinks this cup of the Lord unworthily is guilty of sinning against the body and blood of the Lord. That is why you should examine yourself before eating the bread and drinking the cup. For if you eat the bread or drink the cup without honoring the body of Christ, you are eating and drinking God’s judgment upon yourself. That is why many of you are weak and sick and a number of you have fallen asleep. But if we would examine ourselves, we would not be judged by God in this way. Yet when we are judged by the Lord, we are being disciplined so that we will not be condemned along with the world. So, my dear brothers and sisters, when you gather for the Lord’s Supper, wait for each other. If you are really hungry, eat at home so you won’t bring judgment upon yourselves when you meet together. I’ll give you instructions about the other matters after I arrive. Now that I have read a considerable section of Paul's letter, I get a better idea of what is going on, or I should say, what was going on in Corinth. In modern language, Paul was telling the Corinthians to examine themselves; he was saying, "look at what you are doing!"
The early Christians gathered for a complete meal. They broke the bread and passed it around. The meal concluded when the cup was passed around. There was no clergy to officiate this gathering. Today, our religious traditions have forced us to chew a tiny tasteless cracker and drink a thimble of grape juice while focusing on ourselves rather than remembering and celebrating our Lord. This is perhaps the best commercial ever and it is not put out by a Christian organization.
6 Comments
1/10/2018 12:50:43 pm
“Glum”? Having attended one of the churches you reference, I must say any “glum” would be internalized. Somber, yes. Quiet, yes. I first looked into the scriptures regarding our remembrance of the Lord’s Supper in college when an Iranian student accepted my invitation to our Baptist church on a Sunday morning when we celebrated the Lord’s Supper. My original question had to do with the “members only” admonition - how do explain that to a guest accepting an invitation. And, lessons from then through the last 50 years has helped me understand. The remembrance of our Lord’s offer of bread and fruit of the grape to His disciples was not part of the meal but a lesson following a full Passover meal. He gave specific directions as to what the two items meant, and they related to His death - the sacrifice of His body, His blood. I see no indication that it was to be a celebration, but - as He stated - a remembrance. The celebration is what we do every Sunday as we gather in celebration of the day His grave was empty. We are not forgiven of our sins at the Lord’s Supper - I have no idea where that thought originated. But unless you are different from other Christians I know, I sinned between each one. I shouldn’t, but I did - and do. As I remember His body, His blood - the same physical make up as mine - given that I might be forgiven, I should think about what they are and commit to do better because I received His salvation. I do that in remembrance. I see no biblical admonition to do it differently. Especially from a single letter to one church with specific problems - written that we might apply examples, not specifics, to our own lives. What part of this do you find in disagreement with your interpretations?
Reply
FaithbyHearing
1/10/2018 09:02:51 pm
I will attempt to respond in the order that questions and comments were written. I hope all is well with you today. Thank you for reading my blog and commenting.
Reply
FaithbyHearing
1/10/2018 09:20:43 pm
bread into the bowl with me. 21 The Son of Man will go just as it is written about him. But woe to that man who betrays the Son of Man! It would be better for him if he had not been born.” 22 While they were eating, Jesus took bread, gave thanks and broke it, and gave it to his disciples, saying, “Take it; this is my body.” 23 Then he took the cup, gave thanks and offered it to them, and they all drank from it. 24 “This is my blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many,” he said to them. 25 “I tell you the truth, I will not drink again of the fruit of the vine until that day when I drink it anew in the kingdom of God.” 26 When they had sung a hymn, they went out to the Mount of Olives. 1/11/2018 09:46:06 pm
Before we go further, a couple of ground rules, please. There is no need to copy/paste the full scripture. From the reference we can compare translations. BibleGateway is an excellent site, as well as YouVersion. Second, may we agree on Strong’s for both the Hebrew and Greek foundational word meanings?
Reply
1/12/2018 02:31:03 am
Yes, I will not copy/paste scripture and Strong's is excellent.
Reply
1/12/2018 02:27:48 pm
After a good deal of thought - and a bit of research, I've decided I've better things to do than explain my reasoning nor my interest in religions. The one thing this has confirmed for me is that we each have our own way of reaching and worshipping. It really doesn't matter whether or not we agree on versions, nor does it matter whether or not we agree on the semantics of "celebrate." Semantics separate us in a number of ways, but commonalities are stronger. That was reinforced when - during said research - I read about an interfaith family (https://interfaithfamily.com/holidays/passover_and_easter/a_multicultural_passover_a_solemn_easter_and_a_celebration_of_spring/). There is no reason for me to show contrariness to your religious selections, simply enjoy the tendrils of commonality. God bless.
Reply
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
CHRISTIAN
|